Eddie Bravo On Gi vs. No-gi Training

Taken from www.mixedmartialarts.com. Big ups to Alaina Hardie for brining this to my attention. Link to thread.

“When all the greco roman Olympians striving for the gold in the Olympics
train both then I will bring back the gi for my students sake.

Marcelo is very good with the gi, but he doesn’t separate from the pack in
the gi like he does no-gi. In no-gi he is the supreme god. Think about the
gi gods in the game over the last 10 years. Think of their names. Think of
the ones that were KIngs in the gi but for some reason it never translated
to ADCC. Forget about the few that did make the transition beautifully like
Roger, Jacare, and of course the no-gi Jesus, Marcelo. Forget about them for
just one second. Think about all the other amazing multiple time Mundial
champions out there that never did much no-gi.

Why is that? Why is there so many?

Why does Marcelo do so much better no-gi than gi? Again, I know he has won
the mundials a few times but I can think of a few guys that had unbelievable
dominating reigns that eclipse what Marcelo has done with the gi.
But when it comes to no-gi, Marcelo is light years ahead of them. Why?

The answer is that, like all greco roman wrestlers, Marcelo understands that
the clinch must be mastered. The clinch in every position must be mastered.
Just like the plum clinch in Muay Thai, he who has the most polished plum
clinch lands more knees.

Marcelo works on his clinch on a daily basis, clinching medicine balls, and
clinching the over/under control while riding on dudes backs. He clinches
and rides and works on his clinching endurance without even going for the
choke. He’ll ride and clinch for a few minutes working on his squeezing
endurance before securing the choke. He understands that every different no
gi position requires a different clinch to be mastered there. I know
Marcelo, I am not talking out of my ass.

Marcelo is the no-gi god because he has a stronger, tighter, harder clinch
than any other bjj player on the planet. Clinching and squeezing while
moving into scoring position and clincing and squeezing while choking
someone out. In no-gi grappling, it’s all about how powerful your squeeze
is.

To be super offensive no-gi you must develope your clinches AND master all
clinches. Every second you train with the gi you are not training your
clinch. You are training your yank and pull. Totally different. Totally
different muscles, totally different base. If you want to get offensive in
no-gi like Marcelo, then when are you working on your clinch? Unless you
train no-gi grips with the gi on like some do, you are not working your
clinch if you are grabbing the gi.

But you don’t need to develope your clinch for defense. You need to develope
pushing explosion for defense, which you can get from gi training but you
also get that from no-gi training as well. That’s why gi guys with no clinch
are still very hard to finish in no-gi competition. Explosiveness, posture
and core strength are more important for defense than developing a clinch.

Every time you train in the gi and set up a submission while yanking on
collars and sleeves you are not working on your clinch, it’s that simple.

When I get into these gi/no-gi debates, it always ends up with the gi people
never giving me specific explanations of how the gi makes your nogi game
“tighter”. All they end up saying is, “Roger, Marcelo and Jacare train in
the gi so I’m gonna train in the gi”, no break downs like the ones I’m
giving. I am giving you detailed explanations and anaolgies, but all I get
in return is,”But you trained in the gi!” and stuff like that.

Machida, Anderson, and GSP all have black belts in Karate or TKD, does that
mean that all mma fighters should start training Karate? Most submission
fiends all came from the gi, that’s all there was in the 90′s. If you were
fascinated by chokes and breaking limbs, you had to put a gi on. Even now,
most schools that specialize in submissions make you wear a gi.

And the “What about defense?” arguement. Well, yes , it’s harder to explode
out of submissions with a gi, so you are working your defensive
explosiveness but how do you defend leg locks with a gi? The answer is hold
on to your opponent’s collar. How does that make your no-gi game “tighter?”

How do you defend kimura’s in the gi? The answer is grab on to your pants.
How does that make your no-gi game “tighter?”

How do you defend against arm bars? The answer is hold on to your own
collar. How does that make your no-gi game “tighter?”

How do you defend against rear naked chokes? The answer is cross your wrists
under your chin and hold on to both your collars. How does that make your
no-gi game “tighter?”

Even when you’re on top caught in a triangle, a very popular escape is to
grab your opponent’s collar and push it down across his neck while stacking
him. How does that make your no-gi defense better again?

Judo and Greco have the same goal, throw your opponent. Judo with yanking
and pulling the gi, Greco with clinching and squeezing overhooks and
underhooks.

Bjj and sub grappling have the same goal, pass guard and submit. BJJ with
yanking and pulling the gi, sub grappling with clinching and squeezing
overhooks and underhooks. That’s it, I can’t put it into simpler terms.

I am not saying only train no-gi, and that the gi sucks. The gi is fun for
many people. If you like both train both, it’s all sooo good.

All I’m saying is that the gi does not make you no-gi “tighter”, it makes
you better in the gi, that’s it. The fact that a dude who has trained in a
gi for years and one day decides to take it off and it turns out he’s got
game no-gi does not prove that the gi makes your no-gi game tighter. A
tennis champion can hop over to raquetball and be pretty damn good from day
1, but that doesn’t mean that all aspiring raquetball players should play
tennis first to tighten up their game?

Most kickboxers in the 70′s came from TKD, Karate, and Kung fu, does that
mean that if you want to be a kickboxing champion you have to take TKD
first? That’s what they thought back then, but now we know that theory is no
longer relavent.

Gi training does not make your no-gi tighter, it actually makes it looser.
Watch ADCC 2003 and count how many times top bjj legends lost back control.
It’s like 40 times. It’s quite incredible how many times these bjj
superstars couldn’t stay on anyone’s back.

Then check how many times Marcelo has lost back control in his entire ADCC
career, I think it’s like twice. Diego Sanchez is the only dude I can
remember escaping from Marcelo’s back clinch, but it could’ve happend one or
2 more times. And that was before Diego decided to train in the gi, he was a
pure no-gi guy. Imagine that. One of the only guys to ever escape Marcelo’s
back control DIDN’T come from a gi back ground. Hmmm.

If all this clinch talk is confusing you and you’re not even sure what to
make of it or if you should believe me, ask your instructor what he thinks
about developing no-gi clinches. You never know, he might have a clinch
developing system just like Marcelo’s :)”

HARDYGETSPURPLE

17 Responses to “Eddie Bravo On Gi vs. No-gi Training”

  1. Erik says:

    I’m down with what Eddie says here all the way. The clinches makes the nogi game different from the gi game. I’m disappointed that I train at schools that almost exclusively use the gi, and I know my nogi game suffers because of it. But nogi is still very important to me, and I know in order to have my nogi game fully equal my gi game, I’ll have to spend equal time out of the gi.

  2. Erik says:

    Btw, that’s not to say that I don’t value the gi game. Gi game is awesome and super interesting and it fascinates me, but it’s undeniably different from the nogi game. I like being a fighter who is interested in working to be strong both in the gi and out of it.

  3. The problem is finding many No Gi schools who actually know what they are teaching. There are very few still in most areas. What’s even worse is there are no 10th planet schools in my area. That is one of the reasons I am looking forward to http://www.10thplanetjj.com to go live, so me and my buddies can train in the system. Any word on that?

  4. Erik Wahlberg says:

    Finally an article I can share with my gi-loving friends. Not to put it in their face, but to have a full, well constructed explanation.

    Thanks to Eddie for writing that. Awesome.

  5. JMW says:

    ya what dansmuaythai said thats my situation i live about 3 hours from Dallas and was thinking of trying to get up there every now and then but in light of resent events I scratched that idea

  6. jbrentsmith says:

    I went over to the underground and read a little bit about their debate going on over the no-gi vs gi. People are crazy. Its almost as bad as having a religious debate.

  7. JMW says:

    also does anybody have any details on the site like I think read something about belt testing through the site it seems crazy to me but does anybody have any info

  8. Mr Myagi says:

    Guru Inosanto explains that there has always been different types of competition for the fighting systems throughout the world. The competition is defined by the rules. These rules may impose different types of uniform and then it is up to the fighter to follow the rules but learn to exploit them. What Eddie says about Judo and Greco outlines this really well. They both have the same objectives but the uniform is different. Therefore the fighter has to do different things to acomplish the objectives. It is exactly the same with no-gi grappling and gi grappling. With the gi there are certain things you can do and with the no-gi competition there are other things you have to do because there is no cloth to hold onto or use. Therefore they both have meritis and if you have enough time then you should train both because they complement one another. You can cross train no-gi and gi training too because there are certain comanalities that dont need to be repeated wearing a gi or not.

    BUT they are different systems even though they may look similar and you need to train in both areas if you want to get good at them. Yes there is a certain amount of cross over but to excel you need to actually do the one you want to excel in. Nothing is for free remember so doing gi like Eddie says and expecting to be good at no-gi is a pipe dream!!

    One other thing I’d like to say as well, to the comment above that the guy made about it being like religion. He’s kinda right but this is not religion it’s tradition. Eddie is going through exactly the same trouble as Bruce Lee had to in the sixties. Lee was trying to break away from the traditions and he met the same stupid and unfounded arguments that Eddie is facing today. ‘Just because’ or ‘we always have done it this way’ is the no thinking approach of tradtion. Eddie provides quality arguments just like Lee did back in the sixties. They are not heard. But it doen’t matter because if you look back, Lee was saying, train in arts that excel in particular areas. Look at the MMA scene today, now people are doing just that and more. So Eddie’s arguments will be heard in years to come when people realise what he is saying is true. Just like people are doing what Lee was saying to do 40 years ago.

  9. Debacle says:

    ^^ Well said.

  10. Erik Wahlberg says:

    Mr Myagi rocks. yes, perfectly stated.

    I constantly describe Eddie to my friends as the “Bruce Lee” of jiu-jitsu.

  11. I couldn’t agree more. I have always been a HUGE JKD/Bruce Lee fan, and part of the reason was because I view him as an inovator. Not because he came up with something new, but because he simplified things. I think that is probably the reason I am so attracted to the 10th Planet JJ system.

  12. CloverG74 says:

    Why cant we all get along??? It just seems like tradition is getting upset with the modern day. I think utilizing both styles is the best way to go, you never know what situation ur going to be in. Its not about the better style, its about how hard u train to be the best.(coming from a white belt)